MaxBoxing
Crave Online

SPORTS  >  MAXBOXING

MaxTV Podcasts Fight Galleries Ring Card Girls Fight Schedule Radio Todays Press Message Boards
Login
 
Max Analysis
Steve Kim
Steve Kim's Archive Steve Kim's Facebook Steve Kim's Twitter Steve Kim's Blog Email Steve Kim
Gabriel Montoya
Gabriel Montoya's Articles Gabriel Montoya's Facebook Gabriel Montoya's Twitter Gabriel Montoya's Blog Email Gabriel Montoya
Montoya's Mailbag Archive
Coyote Duran
Coyote Duran's Articles Coyote Duran's Facebook Coyote Duran Website Email Coyote Duran
Radio Rahim
Radio Rahimn's Interviews Radio Rahim's Facebook Radio Rahim's Google+ Radio Rahim's Website email Radio Rahim
Talkin Boxing With Billy C Live
Talkin Boxing with Billy C on YouTube

LUIS CORTES

Luis Cortes Archive

ALEC KOHUT

Alec Kohut Archive

MARTY MULCAHEY

Marty Mulcahey Archive

ALLAN SCOTTO

Allan Scotto Archive

STEPHEN TOBEY

Stephen Tobey Archive

GERMAN VILLASENOR

German Villasenor Archive

ANSON WAINWRIGHT

Anson Wainwright Archive

MATTHEW PARAS

Matthew Paras Archive

DANIEL KRAVETZ

Daniel Kravetz Archive

JASON GONZALEZ

Jason Gonzalez Archive
New MaxTV Videos
Espinoza Boxing Club

RECENT TOPICS ON THE MAXBOXING FORUMS

xml error
Solution Graphics

featured sponsor

Judges suspended over Williams vs Lara

NEW JERSEY STATE ATHLETIC CONTROL BOARD

SUSPENDS WILLIAMS VS. LARA JUDGES

 

BOARD IS "UNSATISFIED" WITH THE JUDGING;

"REMATCH MAY BE WARRANTED"


LOS ANGELES  - The controversy continues to swirl surrounding the Paul Williams vs. Erislandy Lara fight which took place in Atlantic City last Saturday night.  In a move announced Wednesday, the New Jersey State Athletic Control Board ("NJSACB") placed all three judges who scored the fight on an indefinite suspension.  In its announcement (below), the NJSACB commented that a rematch of the fight "may be warranted" in the wake of the judges awarding Williams a decision victory in a fight which the majority of media members and fans in attendance, as well as those watching the HBO telecast, had Lara winning easily.  Two judges scored the fight for Williams, 115-114 and 116-114, while the third scored the fight a draw (114-114).


Having concerns regarding the final scores rendered by the judges, the NJSACB called all three judges to the Board’s offices in Trenton for a full review of each judge’s scoring of each round.  Following the review, the Board determined that "there was no evidence of bias, fraud, corruption or incapacity on the part of any of the judges."  However, after hearing the judges’ explanations of their scoring, the Board remained "unsatisfied" with the scoring and suspended all three judges indefinitely.  Each judge will be required to undergo additional training before being allowed to judge a professional boxing match again.

 

The NJSACB concluded that under these circumstances, the Board does not have the legal authority to invalidate the judges’ decision nor to mandate a rematch.  The Board did, however, express its opinion that a rematch "may be warranted."

 

The actions and opinion of the NJSACB seem to support the assertion of Erislandy Lara, Golden Boy Promotions and Lara’s management that Lara was the true winner of the fight against Williams and that a rematch is deserved.

 

            Golden Boy Promotions salutes the NJSACB and its commissioner, Aaron Davis, for promptly reviewing the decision and taking decisive action to uphold the highest standards of integrity and competence among its officials.

 

For more information on Golden Boy Promotions and Erislandy Lara, visit www.goldenboypromotions.com, follow us on Twitter at @goldenboyboxing or become a fan on Facebook at www.facebook.com/GoldenBoyBoxing.



© 2010 MaxBoxing UK Ltd